- Home
- About
- FAQ
- Law & Politics
- Media
- Events
- Press Information
- Christians Take Over Interfaith Army Chapel in Combat Zone
- Press Kit
- 9/11: 'Never Forget' Must Include All Victims
- Atheists Advocate Separation of Church and State at DNC
- Congressman Pete Stark to Speak at 2013 National Convention
- American Atheists Announces 50th Anniversary Logo Design Contest
- American Atheists Announces Harassment Policy for Conventions and Conferences
- American Atheists Jubilant Over Latest Religion Report
- American Atheists Removes Religious Billboards from Charlotte
- Former Pastor Now American Atheists Public Relations Director
- Former Pastor Teresa MacBain New Public Relations Director
- ITALIAN JUDGE LUIGI TOSTI ACQUITTED!
- American Atheists to Protest Bradford County, FL Decalogue on May 19
- Join
- Shop
Supporting Civil Rights for Atheists and the Separation of Church and State
11
Aug
2011
Is Atheism a Political Movement?
Atheism is not a political movement, but it can certainly influence politics. However, it can only do so if two things happen: 1) politicians recognize that atheists are a legitimate constituency and 2) candidates who are atheists have a viable chance at winning their races.
So the question then becomes, how do we accomplish those two things? Both of those items are hampered by one thing: the lack of activism by the country’s non-religious citizens. The American Religious Identification Survey of 2008 showed that 15% of Americans identify as non-religious. With 311 million people in the United States (June 2011 figures), that is 46.65 million Americans who are non-religious.
Out of those 46.65 million non-religious citizens, roughly 40,000 are active in any given group and are part of the movement in one way or another. The rest are either silent or remain in the closet for fear of repercussions.
Imagine if almost 47 million non-religious citizens came out of the closet tomorrow and became politically active based on secularism, all voted, and all joined the secular movement: the political landscape of America would change overnight.
There are roughly 36 million Baptists, 29 million mainline Christians (Methodists, Lutherans, Presbyterian, Anglican, Episcopalian, Church of Christ), 32 million “Generic” Christians (non-denominational, Evangelical), 8 million Pentecostal/Charismatic, 7 million Protestants, 3 million Mormons, 2.6 million Jews, 2 million Eastern religions, 1.3 million Muslims, and 3 million “other” religions (ARIS 2008).
That means the non-religious of America outnumber the Methodists, Lutherans, Presbyterians, Anglicans, Episcopalians, Church of Christ, Jews, Mormons, Eastern Religions, and “others” combined!
Take it to the streets, get the word out, come out of the closet and become active in the secular community.
The Evangelical/Non-denominational fundamentalists have amazing power in Washington, DC and yet the non-religious outnumber them by 15 million voters. Evangelicals are catered to by politicians who try to out-Jesus each other every election and who go out of their way to at least try and pass theocratic legislation or engage in unconstitutional activity by violating the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. Those 32 million evangelicals are catered to why almost 47 million citizens are not just ignored, but outright ostracized and made to feel like second-class citizens of their country. This is especially disheartening considering that 21% of America’s military personnel are non-religious (Population Reference Bureau, pp. 25, 2004).
The non-religious citizens of this country can have a voice in politics and they can run viable candidates if almost 47 million non-religious Americans were to come out of the closet and raise their voice as one. When they raise their voice as one in demanding the Separation of Church and State, civil rights for all non-religious citizens and true freedom of religion, that voice will be heard.
The more non-religious people that come out of the closet and raise their voice, the easier it will be for those still in the closet. The secular movement has a lot to learn from the gay rights movement. Come out if you can and be a beacon of hope to those who cannot.
Writer's Note: There is a new National Atheist Party that is just beginning its grass roots campaign. Do an Internet search and find out more if you're interested.
by Blair Scott
Popular Today
- PZ Myers: "David Silverman, a principled atheist" (530)
- Representative opens House session with Carl Sagan quotation; Ed Buckner in the news about Georgia state parks (154)
- Atheists to Accept Georgia Governor’s Offer by Sending Atheist Books to State Parks (123)
- Welcome to the American Atheists Online Shop (115)
- 2013 National Convention (109)
Pages
Get our Website Updates!
Do you want the latest AA news as soon as it happens?
Sign up using the link below and be the first in the know!
American Atheists Visa
Apply for the American Atheists Visa Card
and show your support with every purchase you make!






Comments
Exactly what geoith says. I've recently removed my support from atheism as a political movement as the obvious interest of many atheists is to spread atheism, not defend church/state separation.
See, for example, a recent and disturbing post on Greta Christina's blog outlining a speech where she told young atheists that even if they disagree with what atheist orgs are doing they should not disagree over it. I thought AA's July 4th campaign was atrociously anti-religion for reasons I explained in detail on this blog previously.
Lately, I mostly check the websites of atheist groups to find out what I might be shot questions over (as I very publicly identify as an atheist). I am absolutely happy to tell people I don't agree with some of the crap I've seen going down in the past months.
As my very Christian friend well said a few days ago, a freethinker is someone who is always willing to examine and re-examine their own beliefs and know when to choose to separate themselves from a speaker or cause which becomes too obviously not associated with their interests.
At the moment she was talking about how she used to listen to Glenn Beck, but it came from an overall conversation of us lamenting as moderates that groups we associate with -- for my part I definitely mentioned AA, among others -- are taken over by idealogues. Or, alternatively, when they gain a certain mass (population wise) the creators, who may have been idealogues to begin with, begin acting as if the people who are generally united under the broader cause also support their specific, exclusionary agendas.
The problem with only advocating church/state separation and not attempting to grow is that we've been losing for years by that approach. The constitution can't protect us when lockstep religious voters elect politicians who appoint judges who are willing to ignore the constitution in pursuit of theocratic goals. And the religious can afford to violate the constitution over and over, wearing down the limited resources of a few thousand constitutional activists. The only way not to lose is to grow, which is why I recommended starting your own sub-group rather than dropping out. If Catholics and Protestants can work together for theocracy, atheists on the left and right can work together for freedom.
I think one of the problems with organized atheism having a larger overt membership is the conflict between the positions, real or perceived, of many atheist organizations on issues other than atheism itself.
In my opinion, this organization has a distinctly "left" leaning viewpoint on many collateral issues. For example, public schools. While I personally support keeping religion out of the public schools, I do not support the public schools.
Until I find an atheist organization that sufficiently avoids or marginalizes these conflicting collateral positions, I won't be directly supporting them.
This is the old big tent / small tent debate. Make your tent too big and no one will feel at home or get excited about it. Make it too small and you're excluding valuable contributors and cutting the group's power. Religion maximizes its power by having multiple diverse organizations, so everyone can find a small tent organization they can support. As a result, about 100% of religious people can find some group they can feel at home with and enthusiastically support. Even though these groups disagree with each other, they work together politically and control our world. We would be wise to mimic the strategy.
.
As for those who feel left out of the "mainstream" atheist movement - what are you doing, waiting for someone else to organize your group for you? It's never been easier with the internet and social media.
Quote from Chris B: "As for those who feel left out of the “mainstream” atheist movement – what are you doing, waiting for someone else to organize your group for you?"
No, I take my political support to other organizations that offend fewer of my values.
The issue is, as geoih pointed out, that while we may agree on there being no god or gods, we still disagree largely on different issues. I am an extreme liberal socialist and Athiest, however I know of a large group of anarchist Atheists...Democrats and Republicans are mostly united in a basic party platform along liberal or conservative lines. Atheist is a broad non-belief in religious matters, we require a significant and larger overarching political identity in order to start unifying fellow Atheists.
I think atheism is a political, social and most of all cultural movement. I think its the only way out of ignorance in our ill society.
Pages