- Home
- About
- FAQ
- Law & Politics
- Media
- Events
- Press Information
- Christians Take Over Interfaith Army Chapel in Combat Zone
- Press Kit
- 9/11: 'Never Forget' Must Include All Victims
- Atheists Advocate Separation of Church and State at DNC
- Congressman Pete Stark to Speak at 2013 National Convention
- American Atheists Announces 50th Anniversary Logo Design Contest
- American Atheists Announces Harassment Policy for Conventions and Conferences
- American Atheists Jubilant Over Latest Religion Report
- American Atheists Removes Religious Billboards from Charlotte
- Former Pastor Now American Atheists Public Relations Director
- Former Pastor Teresa MacBain New Public Relations Director
- ITALIAN JUDGE LUIGI TOSTI ACQUITTED!
- American Atheists to Protest Bradford County, FL Decalogue on May 19
- Join
- Shop
Supporting Civil Rights for Atheists and the Separation of Church and State
14
Nov
2011
New American Atheists Billboards Launched!
We launched our new billboard campaign today! The newest billboard design went up at the New Jersey side of the Lincoln Tunnel (same as last year's MYTH billboard) as well as in Ohio. In addition, a variation to the billboard has gone up in Florida to advertise our regional convention in Fort Lauderdale that is taking place in December.
You can read the press release here and get more details and see what the billboards look like here.
posted by Blair Scott
Popular content
- Conference Code of Conduct (19,580)
- Lawsuits (19,365)
- CESAALA (19,087)
- Founding Fathers (19,080)
- Did Jesus Exist? (18,985)
Pages
Popular Today
Get our Website Updates!
Do you want the latest AA news as soon as it happens?
Sign up using the link below and be the first in the know!
American Atheists Visa
Apply for the American Atheists Visa Card
and show your support with every purchase you make!






Comments
kt82 your post is refreshing thank you for your words I appreciate what you have had to say. I understand your thoughts on the validity of the Bible, And I would encourage you to take Greek and Hebrew courses, even latin, I have taken both Greek and Hebrew, and everything I've studied in the languages from the manuscripts that have been carefully compiled and translated are remarkably close from text to translation. Now there are some translations that have come from controversial sources that chose to translate with a bias. For everyone of those there is many more translations that have tried to stay as true to the text as possible. Certainly there are things that are lost in translation that take explaining with a proper understanding of the original languages. So I would encourage you to continue to study the Bible, it's origins, what it has to say and see the fruit there. I also understand the idea of fallible men writing the Bible, which is true the men who wrote the Bible were fallible but the God who inspired them to write it is not and was intimately involved in their writint to make sure what was recorded was written correctly, without error and even after that the same God guided the men copying it to do it correctly. This is why fallible men can wirte an infallible, inerrant book. Thank you for your comment
Another thing I appreciate is that you are right about sources proving peoples existence scientific and historical investigation can never offer certainty, it doesn't matter what we are investigating in this way the most that can be asserted is that something is highly probable. Then it's probability is strengthened or lessened based on this material. If this is all we go on there is never any certainty in it. Thank you for your comments
What a colossal waste of time. Your book isn't worth the paper it was printed on. It never was.
Uh...they're ALL biased. About fairy tales.
Excuses, excuses, that's all those 'explanations' are. The historical facts severely contradict your book.
By that logic, none of the 'controversial biased sources' you mentioned prior could interpolate.
What utter, errant nonsense. This is special pleading. I've amply demonstrated that the thing is anything but 'inerrant'. It's arrogant nonsense, the effort of Man to project his shadow upon the universe.
It's called 'reasonable doubt'. There is more than enough reasonable doubt to make the assertion that a good 90% of what was written never happened. The other 10% is sketchy at best.
Balderdash. I've heard that before. Jerusalem was a cultural center, & we actually DO have some fairly good record-keeping from back in the day.
The christian habit was to burn documents that countered what the patricists had to say.
I'm not going to hold my breath. That's an appeal to incredulity. I'll believe it when I see it.
Jerusalem's record-keeping was on paper, which can be easily lost, damaged, destroyed... and the fact still exists that the early Christians burned a large amount of documents and data, simply because some content may disprove or go against their believe's. I also imagine that those who were against this hid documents which they deemed important, which is why I say who knows what lies ahead.
Also, Some recent scientific discoveries have in some manner proved the existence of Jesus. If we are able to see or prove it someday (by we I mean scientists), everyone would believe, but that's the point of Faith believing without seeing
I'm curious as to why there aren't pictures of the billboards on the article?
The muslims are who kept all of the documentation from the fall of roman. There wouldn't have been a renaissance without them. There were a lot of adequate recordings, and yet all we get about Jesus is hearsay.
kt82,
He was an annoying proselytizer.
My comment was only a logical extension of his opinion that Heaven exists and how wonderful it would be to get there; to be in eternal bliss, what could be better for those whom you love?
I think I also mentioned that he must miss her but...
He then left in a huff, saying, "To Hell with your stupid logic", or some such thing. Hypocrisy is strong in the theist.
I presume that you don't call yourself a christian since you do not believe in the inerrancy of the Buybull.
I use a Firefox add-on called BBCodextra - it gives me a right-click menu that provides me w/blockquotes, italics, underlines, etc.
Block quotes make for better legibility anyways.
Ok, Thanks! I wonder if they have that for IE...
Funny thing how people try to prove the existence of Jesus in order to find a foundation for their personal believes while a) blotting out all historical evidence that undermindes them and b) claiming that the belief does not require any evidence whatever and is in itself stronger than all rational knowledgde. That I call slightly inconsistent.
Now, on the other hand, to get things straight: As for the Flood, well that almost certainly didn't happen like the bible says it did. The Jewish bible however recalls a story that was going around the Mediterranean and the Black Sea at the time and that almost certainly has a factual basis (i.e. the waters of the Mediterranean flooding the Black Sea basin, back then a gigantic sweet water lake with lower water levels). This can be said about a number of biblical stories. Does that make the bible correct? No. It just proves that it's a pretty good collection of fairy tales, often based on actual events embellished with imagination. But that goes for pretty much any of the so called holy books.
As for the prophecies: Well, usually when there is a prophecy, somebody will turn up sonner or later and find a way of declaring it to have been accurate - in hindsight to be precise. The older a prophecy is, the more events are claimed to have been predicted by it. (look at Nostradamus)
As for the historical Jesus: Most of the references outside the bible most certainly have been edited into historical texts by Christian transcribers. Very often, as in Josephus's text, the style changes noticeably when the text refers to Jesus. That I call a conincidende.
What we know is that Jeshua (the Jewish original version of the name) was a very popular name back then and that self appointed prophets (but then again, prophets are immutably self appointed) were running around in ancient Israel in large numbers around the 1st century. Probably a few of them claimed to be the Messias and their message was often apocalyptic. Also, miracles were attributed to most of them. Not very suprising, given the state of knowledge an medicine back then. The only sources that survived were those Christians had no access to until modern age - which is basically in the Q'mran caves and similar sites. Also, a few pagan stories survived that contain many elements later attributed to Jesus.
So, there may very well have been a charismatic prophet called Jeshua to whom the gospels refer. What seems more likely is that the stories told about several prophets, maybe even by the same name, have been blended into one by a group of Hellenistic Jewish converts who added some motives from the pagan world around them: The son of a god motive, the immaculate conception and the like.
It shows.
That would be an archeologist.
Got link?
You need to prove this god fellow exists FIRST.
Maybe you weren't paying attention - I don't accept the bible as an authority on anything, & apocryphal crap like the gospel of Judas, Thomas, Nicodemus, etc. even less so.
Yeesh - the secret gospel of Dr. Seuss.
"That would be an archeologist"
Yep- but don't paleontologists study prehistoric life formsand evolution?
"Maybe you weren’t paying attention – I don’t accept the bible as an authority on anything, & apocryphal crap like the gospel of Judas, Thomas, Nicodemus, etc. even less so"
That's kool, I don't really accept it as such neither, 2 me it's a bunch of very old books written a long time ago which have sustained time, and contain the uthor's outlooks and believes. (as per my entry below) just like I respect the wall carvings the ancient aborigenes left behind. But as far as it's credibility, I can also write a Gospel (some day) and leave for future generations.
"Yeesh – the secret gospel of Dr. Seuss"
Hey, can I get a copy?
Your intellectual and word knowledge is refreshing, I must admit I've had to google a couple of the words you've used.
Quick question, are you using html codes in your replies, because they seem different then the rest, but I'm not sure if it's supported
"Maybe, what people saw and deemed as God were really aliens far more technologically advanced than we are, and without knowing how to explain it, our ancestors named them Gods"
This sentence reminded me of Assassins Creed, and for that reason I like it. ^_^
Now, how would you know I'm not a scientist?...
You're right though I'm not, which is why I said that scientistis or paleontologists may one day prove Jesus' existence, of which recently they have been finding more and more evidence, but by that same token, how can it be proven that he was in fact son of God? since according to the Gospel of Judas, Jesus planned the course of events which led to his death in order to fulfill a prophecy, and that Judas was very obediently following orders. So if he had to plan out the events then that discredits the whole story, and if this gospel is true, then how many other acount of events have been discarded?
Skits, so your God inspired and guided the men to copy the copy the bible inerrantly? And you wonder why we use the words brainwashed, delusional and irrational to describe such beliefs. It is amazing how much power and influence God has when it suits your purpose yet how mysterious and weak he is when it does not. This is a God who can come down to the the tower of Babel and create all the known languages in the world to confuse the people who he worried would reach heaven buidling this tower. Yet he can only inspire and guide the writing of said bible in one or two original languages? Seems rather illogical and weak to most rational minded people. Did God not care about those people and their souls who he confounded with his mutlitude od languages who would not be able to receive his true word? Does God play favorites? Sure seems so. Does not the fact that he plays favorites remove the benevolent and merciful moniker from God? Sure seems so.
So reply now with some illogical, supernatural, or mysterious reason for all of this and prove to all here how gullable and naive you and the flock in fact are. Keep reaching for the stars kid.
Buck--- Well the way I sees it, although God only provided the bible in select tounges, he also gave men the knowledge to translate hence making available in many different languages and dialects.
Obeah--- Sorry, I wasn't judging, although I must say I agree, if you are a true hardcore Christian, you know for a fact that when a loved one dies they go on to a everlasting life in eternal bliss and peace, and should be happy (or feel comfort) knowing they are in a better place.. although personally if my child died I would be so devastated I would either be trying to commit suicide or being commited... definately not blogging about it :(
n-e-way, I was raised in a very debout catholic country and attended a very catholic nun run school, and they teach you at a very young age to be afraid (very afraid) of gods wrath, as soon as I could think for myself I left that... ever since I have been on a tiny quest to find some truth, started by attending different churches and learning from different religions, and they all have different interpretations of the bible (boy, was I confused after that, let me tell ya) not to mention the hipocresy so I decided to read, learn, study, etc on my own and reach my own conclusions. One question--- Why did the "back-in-the-days" church allow some books into the bible and others were ommited? or disallowed?
Also, to me everything is Ying and Yang, there has to be a balance in all things- negative, positive, etc, so based on prior replys above--- in order for a balance to exist it's possible that "God" is both loving and vengeful (???)
Also, he's almighty and shouldn't show human emotions, so why does he show to be jealous?
You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me, (Exodus 20:5)
for you shall not worship any other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God-- (Exodus 34:14)
For the LORD your God is a consuming fire, a jealous God. (Deuteronomy 4:24)
You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, and on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me, (Deuteronomy 5:9)
for the LORD your God in the midst of you is a jealous God; otherwise the anger of the LORD your God will be kindled against you, and He will wipe you off, the face of the earth. (Deuteronomy 6:15)
and gets angry? and likes to tempt us with evil? (He controls the devil after all), why would he create an evil being--- if he knows all then he knew what Lucifer was going to become, He should be perfect and not have the emotions which make us unperfect...
Kt82, oh I see; so it was the native americans and the australian aboriginees laziness and ineptitude why they did not translate the almighty god's word into their language and learn his wise and righteous way? It all makes sense now. How did I not think of that? Maybe, just maybe because it is absurd. The people who wrote this nonsense kt82 did not even know these people or countries existed in 600 bce. So please do better than that.
Why didn't your god provide bibles for these people kt82? Did he not care about these people? Did he not know they existed? Surely an all knowing god would know these people existed. So again which is it, did he not know, did he not care? Either way, not looking good for him. Once you see all the nonsensical items, contradictions, and pure mythology; your god looks more and more like the primitive, barbaric, mysoginist man that wrote this garbage. Come on, are you so desparate for an afterlife that you discard your commonsense and logic?
Hey, if there is a God then he lives in all things, and probably is interpreted differently by different people, I don't know much about the australian aboriginess, but I do come from Incan descendants and as far as I know they did have a God -INTI, and "wrote" about it on caves walls and carvings, of course the people who wrote the Bible didn't know those people existed, they thought the world was flat for goodness sake... All men thorughout the ages have believed in some form of almighty being, and "written" in their own way about it. Who is to say that it's not one of the same?
Kt82, you are all over the place with your posts. After refuting your Yahweh writing the bible, you then jump to Incan mythology as if Inti may have inspired the Incans to the word? Then you post that recent science research has proved Jesus' existence? So what is your position? You seem to believe in monotheism, polytheism and deism all at the same time. Did you skip your medication today?
LOL! Nope, not on any meds...
Like I said before, I don't have any set religion or believe, I do agree that different aspects of the above mentioned make sense and are very plausible, the people within these posts seem very knowledgeable and I like to bounce ideas off to get your insights. I do like to think that there is the possibility of an almighty being, be that who it may... it's comforting to know that there is more to life than the here and now.
With all the evidence available, anything is possible--- Jesus could've existed, it's possible he was just a man that took his religion to the next level, or he was the son of god, or how some recent findings say that he was married to Mary Magdalene, and had descendants.
Maybe, what people saw and deemed as God were really aliens far more technologically advanced than we are, and without knowing how to explain it, our ancestors named them Gods (a lot of recent evidence also points to this)
"God only provided the bible in select tounges...he also gave men the knowledge to translate..."
I'm only human...but it seems kinda strange that the the Christian God would reveal himself to a relatively tiny group of people on a small specific part of the globe while the rest of the people around the rest of the world remained completely ignorant of his existence.
"Also, to me everything is Ying and Yang, there has to be a balance in all things"
I generally hear that the Christian God is omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, and all good. The all good part would make him inconsistent with the Ying-Yang balance of good and evil. I think the notion of an all-powerful God being all-good stems from the ideal that good will inevitably triumph over evil.
"and likes to tempt us with evil? (He controls the devil after all), why would he create an evil being— if he knows all then he knew what Lucifer was going to become"
The problem of evil? The debate between William Lane Craig and philosopher Stephen Law focused heavily on this subject. It's interesting to note that apologetics for the problem of evil that defend the existence of an All-Good God can be flipped to defend the existence of an All Evil God. I'd never thought of it that way until I heard the debate. It's a fairly interesting viewpoint.
"Also, he’s almighty and shouldn’t show human emotions, so why does he show to be jealous? and gets angry?...He should be perfect and not have the emotions which make us unperfect…"
To be fair, this assumes that humans can understand the "mysterious mind of God" and that feelings such as jealousy and anger are strictly human emotions. It also assumes that these emotions make us imperfect. On the flip-side, many people view the negative and fairly human emotions of God in the bible as evidence that it was a book written by men simply trying to understand the world around them.
I've also found it confusing as to why the Christian God seems to care more about whether or not people believe in and worship him rather than if they behave like good, loving, moral people. I don't really believe in any particular God, but if there really is one out there that cares for humans I would think that it'd care more about people doing their best to live good, moral, and fulfilling lives than about people worshiping it like sycophants...
Exactly, I have spoken with different church groups, different christian organizations and asked these same questions, and they always give me the "run around" but never answer. All in all they just don't know, and will probably never know, until God himself gives us the answers. All we have is fallible men's interpretations and uncertainty.
"All in all they just don’t know, and will probably never know, until God himself gives us the answers."
Seeing as how a God would be a supernatural entity that's above the knowledge, understanding, and comprehension of humans in the natural world, this would very likely be true. If a God does exist, I doubt any religion or person in history has or ever will have all the correct ideas on what a God wants and why until that God decides to reveal it himself.
"All we have is fallible men’s interpretations and uncertainty."
This is a major problem because the fallible interpretations of men would render the "inerrancy" of the word of God useless. The Tanak, the Bible, The Quran, etc. are all considered the inerrant word of God by members of different religions. Even if one of the books, the Bible for example, was really the inerrant word of God, the fallible interpretation and uncertainty of men would not only make the inerrancy of the Bible hard to prove but also make the true messages in the inerrant Bible unclear. Giving someone a perfect tool or an inerrant book without the proper knowledge of how to properly use the tool or interpret the book would just lead to more problems...
Like I said, seeing is believing.
Distinct impression you're not a scientist.
This is always an awkward thing to have to say because it seems like there's no polite way to say it, but this billboard is poorly designed. The font should be changed to a condensed typeface to allow for bigger letters in the same space, so you can start reading it from farther away as you drive down the road. The type should all be aligned and have the same background color, (preferably black because white text on a black background is easiest to read), so as to establish a clear eye path. Also, the images should be on only one side of the text. Putting them on both sides causes the eye to bounce back and forth between the text without ever reading anything. Billboards like this generally go unnoticed because they're too information dense and poorly organized to pass the conscious threshold for drivers. If they were made more brief, throwing out "since 1963," and everything else that is not absolutely essential to the point, they would likely be hundreds of times more effective.
It could be something like, but not necessarily exactly, the following:
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/4660/billboardp.png (I just threw this together in a couple minutes to implement the composition fixes above.)
Also, these design techniques could be implemented without reducing the images to strictly Jesus and Santa in order to better compare the idea to other myths, as per the goals of the campaign.
I recommend for the theists to read the born again skeptic guide to the bible so it can clear your head about myths and for the atheists to confirm your unbelief and so it is.
Nice to think there may be peacemakers trying to end the wars. But, as long as people are legislating from religion, which is still on the rise in the U.S., people of reason must resist or be swept under the rug.
When people legislate against schools teaching science, when people legislate against abortion, when people put religious displays on public property, especially government buildings, when people fight to keep McCarthy's religion on money and in the pledge of allegiance, when people fight to rewrite the history of this once-great nation, people of reason must fight back.
I will not be a peacemaker. I must speak up for my freedom of and from religion. I have the right to choose none of the above. This right must be preserved.
Lets hope this one stays up without being vandalized.
It insisted that you can only
It insisted that you can only speak within "the limits set by the shariah law. It is not permitted to spread falsehood or disseminate that which involves encouraging abomination or forsaking the Islamic community".-Garrett Hoelscher
Pages