UPDATE: Supreme Court announced decision on June 14.
For details see American Atheists Press Release
Rallies in reaction in Connecticut,
San Francisco, New York City, and
Philadelphia.
If you know of an organized pledge rally please email us details (what, where,
when, and WHO to contact locally for more info.)
SCOTUS PRESERVES GOD PLEDGE,
RULES AGAINST NEWDOW ON STANDING
Constitutional Merits Of Case Ignored
The U.S. Supreme Court announced today that "under God" would remain
-- at least temporarily -- in the nation's Pledge of Allegiance, and
that California Atheist Michael Newdow lacked proper legal standing to
challenge the controversial practice.
The decision comes in the case of ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT v.
NEWDOW.
Newdow, an attorney and physician, filed suit against the unison
recitation of the Pledge arguing that it interfered with his rights as
a parent to direct the upbringing of his daughter, and violated the
constitutional separation of church and state.
The words "under God" were not a component of the original pledge
which was adopted as an official patriotic tribute by the U.S.
Congress in 1942. At the height of the Cold War, however, the Roman
Catholic Church, Hearst newspaper chain, American Legion and other
organizations demanded that the phrase be amalgamated into the Pledge
as a statement against "godless Communism." Federal lawmakers
approved, and then-President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the measure
in 1954.
Previous attempts to challenge the religionized Pledge including a
suit filed by prominent Atheist Madalyn Murray O'Hair were turned down
by the courts. In 2002, however, the legal challenged filed by Newdow
reached the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, where a panel of
judges ruled that the inclusion of "under God" violated the First
Amendment.
Judge Alfred T. Goodwin opined:
"A profession that we are a nation 'under God' is identical, for
Establishment Clause purposes, to a profession that we are a nation
'under Jesus,' a nation 'under Vishnu,' a nation 'under Zeus,' or a
nation 'under no God,' because none of these professions can be
neutral with respect to religion."
Newdow argued the case personally in front of the Supreme Court two
months ago. Legal observers, including those supporting the "under
God" version of the Pledge, praised his performance noting that he
raised persuasive legal arguments. Today's ruling against Newdow,
however, was based on the peripheral issue of standing. Newdow
remains in a protracted custody fight with the mother of his daughter.
The eight Justices agreed that he lack sufficient status to file the
case on her behalf.
Justice Antonin Scalia recused himself from the case after making
public statements prior to oral arguments that he supported the
religionized version of the Pledge of Allegiance.
Writing today for the eight other jurists, Justice John Paul Stevens
opined: "When hard questions of domestic relations are sure to affect
the outcome, the prudent course if for the federal court to stay its
hand rather than reach out to resolve a weighty question of federal
constitutional law."
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist supported that decision, but
penned a separate opinion arguing that the Pledge as recited today
does not violate the Constitution. News reports indicate that
Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Clarence Thomas concurred.
Is this the end of the NEWDOW case?
"There will be another case -- soon -- challenging the 'under God'
portion of the Pledge of Allegiance," said Ellen Johnson, president of
American Atheists.
In a statement to the news media, Johnson declared that by denying
NEWDOW on the basis of standing, "the high court conveniently
circumvented any substantive legal arguments over the
constitutionality of this invasive practice which insults and
marginalizes millions of Atheists, Freethinkers, Secular Humanists and
other nonbelievers."
Rallies Planned
Numerous groups have announced that they will stage protest rallies
over the latest decision in the NEWDOW case.
Jim Heldberg, spokesperson for San Francisco Atheists, is calling upon
all separations in the Bay Area to turn out tomorrow (Tuesday, June
15) at the Federal Court Building, 7th St. and Mission at 9:00 AM.
Details of other demonstrations can be found at
http://www.atheists.org/pledge. Information can still be posted to
the site -- contact the web master, Ed Gauci, through
egauci@atheists.org.
For further information:
http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/pledge2.htm
("Furor builds in waking of circuit court ruling against religionized
pledge," 6/26/03)
http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/pledge 6.htm ("Ashcroft promises
appeal in Pledge case," 3/6/03)
http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/pledge7.htm
("House votes to support religionized Pledge," 3/31/03
http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/pledge8.htm
(American Atheists file amicus in Pledge suit," 3/26/04)
Spread the Word
If you have a web site, please link to this page. A simple text link will do, or
download this Flash Movie.
March 24 Rally Archive
Click here for March 24, 2004 Rally archive page.
|